Most people suggest that society should be enlightened not to tolerate any form of crime by reporting or making an effort to stop such a crime (Baker & Williams, 2012). Many argue that prosecuting bystanders may not be the solution to this problem. However, the disadvantage of charging bystanders is that innocent people might be charged wrongly in case they did not understand what was going on. The culture of bystanders watching a crime and leaving it unreported must be stopped by prosecuting those found guilty. The main advantage of charging bystanders is to make sure that people do not tolerate crime as they will also be charged either for neglect or omission. Although most people do not like to even get involved in another persons problems, we as citizens have a personal duty to attempt to help or call the police if we notice someone getting attacked. Charging bystanders for omission will go a long way in ensuring such activities are not repeated in the future. The issue of if bystanders should be prosecuted is very important. In this case, 38 neighbors committed an act of omission by not reporting this ordeal to the police. The act of omission is committed when one does not do what is expected of him or what is considered the norm in such a situation (Baker & Williams, 2012). Using archive material, the authors show that there is no evidence for the presence of 38 witnesses, or that witnesses observed the murder, or that witnesses remained inactive. In this case, an act or omission was committed by thirty-eight people that witnessed this murder yet did not bother to alert the police. mained inactive during the murder of Kitty Genovese is not supported by the available evidence. The law requires proof of both the actus reus and the men’s rea so that criminal liability can be determined on the part of the suspects. It includes the unlawful act or omission, commission, or possession that contains the components of a crime. When ethical relativism is put into practice, it implies that. Using archive material, the authors show that there. West’s Encyclopedia of American Law (2008) describes actus reus as an element of criminal responsibility. The authors use the murder of Kitty Genovese to illustrate. remained inactive during the murder of Kitty Genovese - is not supported by the available evidence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |